nonorth.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the nonorth.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host nonorth.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Webfusion Internet Solutions .

openfoam.org 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

 latest news... updated 14/2/13 letter sent to the leader of luton borough council. dear councillor simmons, carl mungazi, luton on sunday cc: luton borough councillors no north write to you not only as the leader of luton borough council, but as a representative of lewsey, one of the wards across the north of luton, that will be severely impacted by the large scale proposed developments currently put forward for consultation by central bedfordshire council. the evidence presented by our neighbouring local authority is horrendous and is something they say they have worked closely with luton with, in order to ensure a cohesive approach to the delivery of sustainable development??? i will give you two examples of this evidence and i ask you to confirm whether you have worked closely with them or not. in previous documents that was submitted to the secretary of state appointed inspector, it was stated that the north of luton was dependent on the proposed luton northern bypass. however, with this road estimated at over £400 million it was never going to happen and turned out to be a fallacy. instead central bedfordshire has put forward revised plans without this. gone is over half the bypass, the section from warden hills to the a505. the supposed dual carriage way from sundon park road to barton road (with a roundabout that uses northwell drive as an access point), has been downgraded to a single. the “dependent” luton northern bypass has literally been bypassed and the consequences are dire. according to central bedfordshire’s own reports i quote, “with the inclusion of the large development sites, the increase in congestion is forecast to be 80% to 100% greater in the am peak hour and 70% to 80% greater in the pm peak hour, compared to 2009”. councillor simmons, i invite you to respond and tell me if you think that for every car currently on our local roads there is room for another? i invite you to comment on behalf of all the people in our area who are travelling to work or taking their kids to school and tell me if a 100 % rise in congestion on our roads is acceptable to the residents in lewsey or in luton? our second horrendous example is this. even with the removal of the “dependent” luton northern bypass there is still a huge infrastructure funding gap of £485 million pounds. this shortfall is made up of education, economic development, green infrastructure, health and social care, leisure, transport, waste, community and culture, and broadband. so not only would we have to contend with polluted and congested local roads but we would have to contemplate urban extensions to luton that would rely on our schools, transport, parks, leisure centres, and other such facilities; are you prepared to accept this? i am sure that you of all people need not reminding of the fact that although the land is under central bedfordshire’s jurisdiction, they are proposed extensions to luton and under the localism bill and national planning policy we have a strong and determining voice. we request that you to use it. our group wish to remind you of the full council meeting on 18th january last year where it resolved, “would not support any development to the north of luton unless it were accompanied by the necessary infrastructure.” central bedfordshire has said that their development proposals have been prepared with luton, but the examples i have brought to your attention would clearly contradict the councils adopted democratic position? on behalf of all the residents in our area we want assurances that the residents you represent will not be double crossed and that the councils mandate on infrastructure will form an objection on the strongest terms within this consultation period. a public response to this letter is requested so that we can be certain that our well-being is protected. regards, pat conway no north coordinator, turnpike drive note: supporting evidence taken from the central bedfordshire council’s website, under strategic planning. click here to view supporting evidence no north lodge 2140 objections and 1 letter of support to the local planning authorities and call on kelvin hopkins mp to investigate and stamp out any apparent corruption that could have devastating consequences for all of the people living in and around the north of luton. click here for our letter to kelvin hopkins click here for our freedom of information request transport minister philip hammond says 'no' to £400m bypass. please click here for full press statement. please click here to listen to conservative, john young's statement. following public meeting 2nd december despite the freezing temperatures, no north’s first public meeting was a resounding success. a packed hall and a pledge from luton conservative councillors katie foord and gilbert campbell to present a motion to luton borough council opposing development to the north of luton. thank you to all who attended and we have taken on board what you said and present the following: how to object: write to us no later than the 17th january and we will present your letter on your behalf. no north are objecting to the 4000 houses, rail freight interchange, limitation to increase capacity on the existing roads like the a6 and b579, location is wrong because of the distance to luton town centre, direct impact on areas of outstanding natural beauty, negative social and economic impacts on the nearby residents, costs to the taxpayer and there are better alternatives for growth that should be considered instead. alternatively click here to email your objection. councillors katie foord and gilbert campbell confirmed they will be presenting a motion opposing this “ridiculous development” to the north of luton. we are expecting them to do this on the 9th december at a full luton borough council meeting and will immediately post this once done. please click here to listen to katie foord's statement. as requested at our public meeting, here are the councillors on the luton and south bedfordshire joint committee who voted for this on 22nd october 2010. luton borough council members roy j davis - labour, northwell ([email protected]) don worlding - labour, northwell ([email protected]) central bedfordshire council members carole hegley - conservative ([email protected]) ken matthews - conservative ([email protected]) david mcvicar - conservative ([email protected]) tom nicols - conservative ([email protected]) alan shadbolt - conservative ([email protected]) nigel young - conservative ([email protected])

URL analysis for nonorth.co.uk

http://www.nonorth.co.uk/foord.m4a
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/resources/kelvin_hopkins_letter.pdf
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/resources/press3-12-10.pdf
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/about.html
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/resources/fir.pdf
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/development.html
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/information.html
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/support.html
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/resources/supporting_documents.pdf
http://www.nonorth.co.uk/young.m4a

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "nonorth.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 1132 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 09:43:35 15-Sep-2017

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS nonorth.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2017.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME nonorth.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS2.123-REG.CO.UK 62.138.132.21

  NS.123-REG.CO.UK 212.67.202.2

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .